Legislative Report 3/21/2016 - The Doyle Poll 2016

Once again the Doyle Poll proved to be popular at Town Meeting with 213 voters taking the time to fill out the survey. Here are the results for your consideration.


Q#

Question

Yes

No
Not Sure

Blank
1
Should cities and towns have a voice in siting industrial energy projects in their communities?
89%
4%
6%
1%
2
Is it important for Vermont to encourage people and jobs to move to Vermont in light of the population loss?
79%
14%
6%
1%
3
Do you believe water quality is a major issue in Vermont?
77%
14%
8%
1%
4
Should Vermont legalize marijuana?
47%
34%
17%
2%
5
Are you concerned about the increased use of opiates in Vermont?
96%
2%
1%
0%
6
Should Vermont require paid sick leave?
70%
18%
10%
2%
7
Are you satisfied with Vermont's health care?
36%
46%
16%
2%
8
Are statewide cell service and broadband important to the future of Vermont’s economy?
77%
13%
10%
0%
9
Does Vermont have too many school districts relative to our declining student population?
60%
19%
21%
0%
10
Do you believe that Vermont's political campaigns are too costly?
48%
17%
34%
1%
11
Should Vermont have a 4 year term for governor?
60%
23%
16%
1%
12
Does Vermont rely too heavily on property taxes for funding education?
77%
9%
13%
1%
13
Should we reduce Vermont's prison population by using alternatives for non-violent offenders?
85%
6%
8%
1%
14
Is Vermont a business friendly state?
29%
43%
26%
2%

There were five questions that appeared in last year's survey (Q3. water quality, Q4. marijuana, Q5. opiates, Q8. cell service and Q9. school districts). The opinion favoring marijuana legalization fluctuated from 48% to 42% to the current 47% over the last three years, while the opinion against moved from 42% to 45% down to 34% indicating a significant shift to undecided. While still an overwhelming majority, a smaller percentage of respondents felt that broadband is important (84% last year). Water quality, concern about opiates and the opinion that Vermont has too many school districts remained nearly the same year-to-year.

Vermont's handling of the health care issue remains in a negative light as problems persist with the Vermont Health Connect system. The slow progress made in addressing the problem of the “change of circumstance” function has been less than satisfactory in the eyes of both the public and the Legislature which is continuing to monitor the situation and consider alternatives. Likewise, high property taxes as the major source of education funding continue to be a general concern.

The overwhelming consensus is that municipalities should have a greater say than they do now in siting renewable energy projects. A lot of work has been done by the Senate in their bill S.230, which has now been assigned to the House Natural Resources and Energy Committee. We have already begun to review the bill which has great potential to provide a path forward to make the siting process more transparent. It will give towns more influence as they develop local renewable energy plans in conjunction with Regional Planning Commissions, while continuing to move Vermont away from fossil fuels and toward a stronger renewable energy economy.

As your representative in Montpelier, I appreciate your input on these and other issues. Your comments help me look at issues from several perspectives, and that is a valuable opportunity for me. You can always contact me by phone at 802-425-3960 or email me at myantachka.dfa@gmail.com.